![]() ![]() Gnome- settings- daemon : Dipende: libappindicator3-1 (>= 0.4.90) ma la versione 0.4.1-0ubuntu2 è installataĭipende: libgnome- desktop- 3-2 (>= 3.3.4) ma la versione 3.2.1-0ubuntu1.1 è installata Raccomanda: indicator-power (>= 1.90) ma la versione 0.9-0ubuntu2 è installata Raccomanda: indicator-sound (>= 0.8.1) ma la versione 0.7.9-0ubuntu2.1 è installata Gnome-control- center : Dipende: libgnome- control- center1 (>= 1:3.3.5) ma la versione 1:3.2.2-0ubuntu1 è installataĭipende: libwacom2 (>= 0.3) ma non è installato Here what I get when I do apt-get dist-upgrade Spawn.Permissio nsInvalid: The permission of the setuid helper is not correctĮ: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2) Here the is what I get with apt-get -f installĭpkg: errore: analisi del file "/var/lib/ dpkg/status" vicino alla riga 11964 pacchetto "crssiss- pdl-cittadino" :Įrror org.freedesktop. Now I have a system that isn't fully upgraded (I don't get any error durring the operation, all was fine), and can't do apt-get -f install or apt-get dist-upgrade to resolve the conflict or upgrade my systems. Same sistuation here, upgraded my linux box from kubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 LTS get same error on a package "crssiss- pdl-cittadino". Parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/control' near line 9 package 'lexmark-inkjet-09-driver': Here is how the packages entry appears in the status file prior to the upgrade:Īgain the blank line appears in the description.Įditing the file doesn't show any other characters on the line (no tabs, spaces, etc) It appears to be just a new line.ĭpkg: error processing (-install): The blank line appears after the first line of the Description. This isĪ copyrighted package, please refer to the copyright notice This package contains the Lexmark Series Drivers. ci/control' near line 9 package 'lexmark- inkjet- 09-driver' :īlank line in value of field 'Description'Įrrors were encountered while processing: Attempting to re-install the package now produces the following error:ĭpkg: error processing lexmark- inkjet- 09-driver- 1.5-1.i386. Their installation package is shipped an a self extracting shell script with the. I could probably send the file to you directly, but I don't think I'm allowed to post it on the site. The version I had installed no longer appears to be available on their support site. It is licensed by them and I'm not sure I'm allowed to post it here. The package is provided by Lexmark for their printers. > /var/lib/dpkg/status and /var/lib/dpkg/available files. Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help New entry and as such it will complain because the new entry does not A blank line means that it will begin to parse a It seems weird because I don't think that dpkg ever allowed a blank line > failed and the update process proceeded to the cleanup/reboot phase. > when the new version encountered the files. > was apparently able to parse the file with the blank line. > blank line in the package description field. > had installed a package from Lexmark for a printer driver that had a > /var/lib/ dpkg/status and /var/lib/ dpkg/available files. > While attempting to upgrade from 11.10 to 12.04 the version of dpkg used UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100318) There may need to be some checks added to the upgrade procedure to prevent upgrade failures when a package description has a blank line. I was then able to complete the upgrade with an apt-get dist-upgrade. I was able to fix them using apt-get install -f. There were some broken packages as a result of the failed upgrade. My system was usable following the reboot, and I was able to find the blank lines and manually edit them to allow dpkg to start working again. any further package updates failed and the update process proceeded to the cleanup/reboot phase. However, when the new version encountered the files. The old version of dpkg was apparently able to parse the file with the blank line. Under 11.10, I had installed a package from Lexmark for a printer driver that had a blank line in the package description field. The new version was unable to parse my /var/lib/ dpkg/status and /var/lib/ dpkg/available files. While attempting to upgrade from 11.10 to 12.04 the version of dpkg used by Ubuntu was upgraded. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |